Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blogs I read
- IUnknown
- muffled vociferation
- Roman Stanek’s Push-Button Thinking
- Obama Scandal
- National Death Service
- Alices' Bubblicious Blog.
- Paul Lockett
- Hatfield Girl
- Bloody Scott
- Man In a Shed
- Julia M
- tractorstats
- dungeekin
- Snafu
- Philip Thomas
- Fred Harrison Renegade Economist.
- House of Dumb
- City Un Slicker
- Sackerson
- Middle Aged Dad
- Mark Wadsworth
- Mark's any musings
- Burning Our Money
- Tim Worstall
- Luboš Motl - The Reference Frame
- Tim Blair
- Guido Fawkes
- Instapundit
- David Thompson
About Me
- AntiCitizenOne
- I strongly dislike being a slave to the government for much of my time. My dream is to end Income tax in the U.K. for the third and final time.
6 comments:
That's a interesting idea, it certainly changes the dynamics in big brother when the voting is changed from voting who evicted to voting for a winner. Lots of voters, me included, vote tactically against a candidate, but often fail if others have a different idea oh who is most likely to beat the hated candidate. How about a choice? You have one vote, you can use it for or against one candidate.
I like it - you could get rid of all the complete and utter bastards in round one and then get rid of the ordinary stupid bastards in round two. Whoever is left after that gets the job! The more I think about it.........yeah!
I like the "None of the above" voting option as in the film "Brewster's Millions".
Now all we have to do is get it past the political class's unerring instinct for perpetuating its position.
Tricky.
Why not do both?
It's a more representative principle than abstaining. It would likely put the BNP in negative territory taking the dilemma away from the BBC.
Post a Comment